My crew cab '86 square

37076 views
189 replies
52 following
S
My crew cab '86 square
BB
big bear
+1y
dayummm...thats a mean ass setup, and what i really like is that its street driven. its not a overbuilt motor that you cant take anywhere. so im guessing that you proably not going to bag it now? that truck doesnt need bags, its perfect as is, and still very reliable. i hate to say it, but i think bags would take away from the pure sickness of your truck.
L
low95xlt
+1y
looks killer man liken the way it turned out.. im a big fan of bags but wow the stance is incredible without them
BB
big bear
+1y
yup exactly, i am also huge fan of bags myself, but it looks killer without.
WL
wide load c-30
+1y
No bags in this trucks future as long as i own it. Probaby just more power/restoration. The no tint look is temporary 'cause Texas summers are hot!
C
carlos
+1y
looks good. the wheels look like they can be pushed out a little more though. looks weird so sunken in.
WL
wide load c-30
+1y
Lol damn, Carlos' first and only post was just to say my truck looks weird. The front wheels are milled 1/8" on the inner side because I wanted a static dropped truck that could tuck and turn without the possibility of rubbing. Everything else on the front is stock. They would have to be a lot more "sunken" in if it was bagged. The rear of the truck is setup to lay out if it ever gets bagged. That is about as far as the wheels can go without rubbing on stock fenders. The rear fenders curve in towards the top.
Post was last edited on Apr 20, 2011 07:36. Edited 2 times.
BB
big bear
+1y
lol...i noticed that . haters gonna hate.
C
carlos
+1y
I see why they are how they are, just looks kinda weird is all. Too bad you can't have them more flush and functional.

I joined not long ago and lurk more than anything. I love duallys.

So quick to throw out the hater moniker when I wasn't even hating.
B
bk2life
+1y
actually the wheels are perfect the way they are. more flush would look like a poop in a diaper -gross
BB
big bear
+1y