I DON'T GIVE A SHIT IF HE WAS DRUNK OR HOW YOUNG HE IS. HE KNOW'S DAMN WELL HE DIDN'T BUILD THAT TRUCK. IF HE DIDN'T KNOW WHO DID THE WORK WHY NOT PUT PREVIOUS OWNER. HE'S OVER THEIR RUNNING HIS FUCKING MOUTH ABOUT HOW IT WAS A SIBLING RIVALRY AND A BONDING EXPERIENCE FOR HIM AND HIS BROTHER. WHAT'S NEXT FOR THIS GUY REPAINT HIS T.V. DINNER, THE SOME WAY HE SAW SOME TRUCK IN MAG. AND SAY HE COME UP WITH THE PAINT SCHEME.
FrameLayN88
+1y
markus (H8MENOW)
I agree with you all the way. I have a friend of mine that did a darn good mini, sold it to some guy in another state. I seen him and the truck ( the same way he bought it)at a show talking about how he did all the work. So I went back to my truck and got the picture book ans showed him up.
I hate people like this! When you did not do any or all of the work, then don't take the credit for it!!!
Just my $.o2
FrameLayN88
Isuzu
MoneyMike2
+1y
picsssssssssssssssssssss
H8MENOW
+1y
NOW LOOK AT THE EX. CAB WINDOW IF I'M MISTAKEN THAT'S A "AUTO CORE" STICKER. GOD DANM I LOVE MAKING PEOPLE LOOK LIKE FOOLS.... NEW MEXICO
ST Kool Laid
+1y
one of my fav f150, love the color on it.
MoneyMike2
+1y
oh i see........i hate it when people buy a truck and than get a feature
geo57
+1y
markus (H8MENOW)
I agree with what yall are saying, but I was there personally with him when he got shot for the mag and he straight up told the photographer that he bought the truck like that and was not sure who or what shop did all the work to the truck. The photographer said "f*ck it just make something up". About the article that was written about "sibling rivalry" was all made up by the publisher and not him, he never said anything about him and his brother, even though his brother was there at the time of the shoot. I guess where i'm getting to is that he never wanted to take credit for the work on the truck, and all that info was made up.
KEG Media
+1y
Originally posted by geo57
markus (H8MENOW)
I agree with what yall are saying, but I was there personally with him when he got shot for the mag and he straight up told the photographer that he bought the truck like that and was not sure who or what shop did all the work to the truck. The photographer said "f*ck it just make something up". About the article that was written about "sibling rivalry" was all made up by the publisher and not him, he never said anything about him and his brother, even though his brother was there at the time of the shoot. I guess where i'm getting to is that he never wanted to take credit for the work on the truck, and all that info was made up.whos the photographer and writer of the article? this is gettin interesting.
dragndime
+1y
I kinda can see how that can happen ..cause the photographers have only one desire....take the pics and get a good tech sheet/background in order to be able to sell the feature to the publishers ....so if they see a truck with a good chance of being picked up...then they are gonna wanna make sure its got good info to go with it ...cause the publisher isnt gonna run/pay for a "i dont know" story
now not saying everyone does that or nuttin.....but can see how if a freelance guy is greedy enough then it can happen
geo57
+1y
Originally posted by mtech
I kinda can see how that can happen ..cause the photographers have only one desire....take the pics and get a good tech sheet/background in order to be able to sell the feature to the publishers ....so if they see a truck with a good chance of being picked up...then they are gonna wanna make sure its got good info to go with it ...cause the publisher isnt gonna run/pay for a "i dont know" story
now not saying everyone does that or nuttin.....but can see how if a freelance guy is greedy enough then it can happen
that's exactly what i thought, as long as the photographer gets paid, he really doesn't care what info goes on the mag, but like you said, not everyone is like that....