Yea, Russ was exaggerating some of the points people use to defend them lol.
Edited: 3/26/2006 9:42:28 PM by tenagator
cant defend a proven fact
Originally posted by tenagator
cant defened a proven fact
yeah if there ever was a credible test, it would be done by djd.
And I was just regurgitating, just a joke. Think of me as Mr Levity.
Why is there nothing on the back of the forward 4-link and there is some stuff on the back of the rear facing 4-link. Is it a weight or something to try to hold down the rear end.
Edited: 3/26/2006 9:18:12 PM by crux131
Edited: 3/26/2006 9:17:22 PM by crux131
Russ, it looks like you are right to, upon closer inspection, the reverse is level at the begining.
Just starts to change so dang fast...lol
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think it is just the framework to mount the reverse 4 link to.
Originally posted by toadfrog17
Why is there nothing on the back of the forward 4-link and there is some stuff on the back of the rear facing 4-link. Is it a weight or something to try to hold down the rear end.
its prolly just the mounts for the 4 link. It makes sense its just basic physics.
I have no issue with the back end four link. why, Shit I am pushing 250 hp on a 22r all bars back like your mexican uncle. (5nine) toy, sucks most when i race cheap Honda's. Talk shit all you want kiss my ass, shit does stop on a dime!
Originally posted by Low_SST
Originally posted by toadfrog17
Why is there nothing on the back of the forward 4-link and there is some stuff on the back of the rear facing 4-link. Is it a weight or something to try to hold down the rear end.
its prolly just the mounts for the 4 link. It makes sense its just basic physics.
Yeah I know reverse 4-links are bad due to physics. I just didn't know what was on the back of the reverse one.
no one feels the need to defend them because 90% of the people who have posted are still running leaf springs or the disaster af all rear suspensions the 2 link.