They're better then two fat chicks and a bag of weed.
they are the best around i think over all performance
I've had mine in for close to three years and other than a little cracks thay are still hanging in there.the new bags aren't supposed to crack like the old ones though. I would recommend them 100%
The RS is an old modle they are now RE's and you would need a RE-72 for that. If you dont mind triming the spring pocket run a RE-82's it will ride smoother and less PSI to lift but a RE-72 is just as good. I only install Slam's and they stand behind there bags 100% They just helped me out with bags we installed a year ago. I have replaced alot of stones and lately conti's too with slams. Slams have to be the toughest bag on the market.
how much trimming of the spring pocket do you think id need? ive already got it trimmed a bit for the 2600s
well depends what kind of ride? i posted about the 82's for the 51 chevy the 82 is 8" wide as a 2600 is 7" wide plus depends on the hiegth of the upper cup
if you can fit a 2600 you can fit a 7" slam bag. The slam bags don't expand like the firestones,contis, airlift bags do so you if your clearanced out for a 2600, a slam will fit no problem.
personally i don't see a need for a 82 in the front of anything except a dually. the 6 will lock up an s10 suspension even on 20's and the 7 will lock up a fullsize suspension up to a 22 on the obs and a 24 on nbs
like i said it depends if its an old lead sled it will ride better on the 82's if its a newer truck of a mini its to much bag stick with a 72