been wondering this for awhile know. is the chevy HHR a minitruck or something else. i know the PT loser isnt cause its moodelled after an old car but the HHR is modeled after a 49 suburban. I meant to ask mike alexander thisweekend if a built HHR could get in MT, so mike if you read this , would it qualify?
oh and i personally feel it qualifies cause itsbassed on the suburban , unlike a PT or Scion that arent based on any truck or SUV at all. let the debat begin
Devin. have you seen them in person.. they are a pt Loser.. they dropped the ball on this one. .. they are small and ugly.. ill bite my tounge if i see one BD or something..
Edited: 8/28/2005 4:06:09 PM by MazberryDelight
i've seen em in person, alot more room in them then i thought thered be . probably will be buying one soon
i dont know.. the guy at the dealership says the hhr has really grown on him... yea WTF ever. im still waiting for the new Beatle, SSR, echo, Xa, saturn anything, etc to grow on me.
Edited: 8/28/2005 4:14:30 PM by spootydlux4
theres a quikie i did. i like em and plus they get like 30mpg, compared with the 15mpg my truck does
doesnt look to bad paint it primer black and some red spray paint flames and your in business. sorry for the hate but i cant stand the idea of combining 40's/50's styling and new shit it makes me wanna puke
If a PT Cruiser is not based after a truck then why was it on the cover of Truckin' Magazine on April 2001? If it is a car then what is it doing on a truck magazine. I think the HHR's should qualify for MT if a PT can be on a truck magazine.
Originally posted by nurface
If a PT Cruiser is not based after a truck then why was it on the cover of Truckin' Magazine on April 2001? If it is a car then what is it doing on a truck magazine. I think the HHR's should qualify for MT if a PT can be on a truck magazine.
dont forget a scion was on the cover of MT awhile back to...